AUTOFYEDGE mark AUTOFYEDGE
AI-Assisted Cyber Assurance

Know which cybersecurity controls are operating—and prove it.

An AI-Assisted, human-reviewed assurance record, mapped to your frameworks.

AUTOFYEDGE improves evidence readiness — it does not guarantee certification, compliance, or audit outcomes.

The Problem

Your controls exist. Proving they work doesn't.

Control evidence spread across ticketing, endpoint, identity, cloud and document systems

Policy statements that don't match technical implementation

Point-in-time assessments going stale within months

Exceptions and compensating controls that aren't tracked

Remediation items with no owner, no date, no proof of closure

Leadership lacking a defensible view of cyber maturity

Incident and ransomware-reporting readiness left undocumented

Penetration-test findings that never became sustained control improvements

How It Works

Connect. Verify. Remediate. Prove.

1

Connect

Connect or ingest approved evidence from existing systems and repositories.

2

Verify

Validate whether controls are operating within the agreed assessment scope.

3

Remediate

Prioritise findings, assign owners, implement fixes and collect closure evidence.

4

Prove

Produce a traceable, human-reviewed control-evidence pack and assurance dashboard.

The Cyber Evidence Assurance Sprint

A fixed-scope sprint, then ongoing assurance

A four-to-six-week engagement, adjusted to scope - AI-assisted, human-reviewed. Not a once-a-year pen test and a PDF, but a standing program of continuous control monitoring, with authorised, time-bounded penetration testing scheduled into the cycle - keeping evidence current between audits.

Core service

Continuous control monitoring

AI-assisted monitoring flags exploitable gaps every day, not once a year - with authorised, time-bounded penetration testing scheduled into the program, not run continuously without your sign-off.

Essential Eight maturity uplift

Structured uplift from your current level to Level Two, with evidence captured automatically as you go.

Incident-reporting readiness and human-approved drafting

Workflows built to meet the Cyber Security Act 2024's mandatory reporting clock without a manual scramble.

Network & critical infrastructure risk mapping

Visual mapping of your network architecture against SOCI Act obligations, for organisations in scope.

Live posture dashboards

Live dashboards tracking patch status, access control, and vulnerability posture - not a point-in-time report.

Security awareness & AI governance

Human-layer controls and AI governance documentation aligned to ISO/IEC 27001.

AI Integration

How AI meets the Essential Eight - and the rest of your stack

The same four-stage EDGE method, applied specifically to where AI does the work: finding gaps, testing controls, and keeping evidence current.

E

Evidence Mapping

AI scans your environment - patch logs, access records, prior incidents - and automatically scores you against each Essential Eight mitigation strategy, pinpointing your real maturity level in hours, not weeks.

D

Design for Compliance

We design continuous control-monitoring workflows and an authorised penetration-testing schedule around the specific gaps AI identifies, targeting Level Two maturity and Cyber Security Act 2024 reporting obligations from day one.

G

Governed Automation

Every AI-assisted test and automated control ships with human-review checkpoints and an explainability log, so findings are defensible and auditable - not a black-box scan.

E

Execution & Assurance

Continuous AI-assisted monitoring tracks your posture day to day, with authorised penetration testing on a scheduled cadence, keeping your Essential Eight evidence and SOCI/ransomware-reporting readiness current as threats evolve.

AI Capability Map

Where AI plugs into your security stack

Five stages, one continuous loop - data in, evidence out.

Network & Endpoint Data

Patch logs, access records, traffic & device telemetry

AI Detection Engine

Scores maturity, flags anomalies against Essential Eight

Automated Pen Testing

Continuous validation of exploitable gaps, human-reviewed

Evidence & Reporting

Evidence-ready packs mapped to Essential Eight & the Cyber Security Act

Continuous Monitoring

Loops back into detection as your environment changes

Beyond Essential Eight

Six frameworks, one evidence trail

This program is built around Essential Eight, but the same AI-mapped evidence extends to whichever of these five other frameworks actually apply to you - no separate engagement, no re-mapping from scratch.

ACSC

Essential Eight

Patching, application control, backups, and access management, benchmarked to Maturity Level Two.

ASD

ISM

The Information Security Manual - the control catalogue behind Essential Eight and most government security baselines.

Government

PSPF

The Protective Security Policy Framework - core security obligations for Australian Government entities and their suppliers.

APRA

CPS 234

Information security capability requirements for banks, insurers, and superannuation funds.

OAIC

Privacy Act

Australian Privacy Principles and automated-decision-making transparency, ahead of the December 2026 mandate.

CISC

SOCI Act

Risk management program obligations for organisations in scope as critical infrastructure.

Where AI-Assisted Testing Plugs In

The active-testing suite, authorisation-gated

Nothing here runs without a signed Rules of Engagement and an explicit go-ahead. Once authorised, testing spans 15 domains, aligned to OWASP, MITRE ATT&CK/ATLAS, CIS, and MASVS - non-destructive by default.

External attack surface

Recon and internet-facing exposure mapping.

Web application

OWASP-aligned, Burp Suite & SQLmap.

API

REST & GraphQL, auth and rate-limit testing.

Network & Active Directory

Kerberoasting, lateral movement, BloodHound.

Vulnerability management

CVE/EPSS-prioritised scanning.

Cloud

AWS, Azure, GCP - ScoutSuite.

Container & Kubernetes

Image scanning and cluster hardening.

Wireless

Wi-Fi and RF security testing.

Mobile

iOS & Android, aligned to OWASP MASVS.

Secure code review

SAST and dependency auditing.

AI / LLM security

Prompt injection and model risk, aligned to MITRE ATLAS.

OT / ICS

Industrial control systems, safety-first by design.

Physical security

Facility and access-control testing.

Phishing & social engineering

Controlled simulations run via Gophish.

Red team

Full adversary emulation, mapped to MITRE ATT&CK.

Every domain is authorisation-gated and non-destructive by default - no domain runs without a signed Rules of Engagement, in-scope targets, and an agreed testing window. See how this fits the EDGE Framework →

Responsible AI

AI-assisted. Human-reviewed. Always.

AI does not make your security or compliance decisions. It does the repetitive work so a qualified person can focus on judgement calls and authorised testing.

What AI does

  • Classifies and compares control evidence against applicable frameworks
  • Summarises scan results and identifies possible gaps
  • Drafts remediation actions and monitors due dates
  • Assists with reporting and evidence-pack assembly

What qualified people do

  • Confirm scope and authorise every technical test
  • Review evidence and validate material findings
  • Approve recommendations and retain accountability
  • Make every security judgement - AI never does

AUTOFYEDGE does not certify Essential Eight maturity, replace qualified security professionals, or guarantee an audit outcome. Technical testing runs only within an authorised, agreed scope.

Founding Client Programme

A limited number of founding cyber engagements

We're taking on a limited number of organisations at a reduced rate in exchange for structured feedback and, with your permission, an honest reference once the sprint is complete. No fabricated case studies, no implied endorsement - just a genuinely earlier-stage rate while we build out the track record.

Cyber FAQs

Questions about the Cyber programme

No. It's a provisional self-assessment based on your own answers, not independently verified or tested. It's a starting point for the conversation, not a substitute for authorised penetration testing or a formal Essential Eight audit.
Never. Every technical test requires a signed Rules of Engagement, an agreed scope and testing window, and explicit written authorisation before anything runs - see the Active-Testing Suite above.
We email your snapshot, and you can book a short Cyber Diagnostic to discuss it. If a fixed-scope Cyber Evidence Assurance Sprint is the right next step, we'll scope it - including any authorised testing - against your actual environment.
No. AI classifies, summarises, and drafts - a qualified person reviews evidence, authorises testing, validates findings, and makes every security judgement. See "AI-assisted. Human-reviewed. Always." above.

Meet Essential Eight without slowing the business down.